In my experience..
NOD32 vs. Kaspersky: Which Is Better?
I have already used a lot of AVs..
First I used Norton 360, then Norton 2009; the 360 really made my computer slow.. To think that I have already used the Quad Core. Then when I transfered to Norton 2009, it was lighter but the 360 was better in discovering the malwares, trojans, spywares, etc.. I was dissatisfied due to the slow processing, so I preceded into Kaspersky, and YES! I got all the trojans, worms, malwares, spywares, and other unknown viruses (new for me) BUT it takes too much RAM memory, I ended up hanging since the computer is so slow with Kaspersky. Well then, finally, I used NOD32 since I have read that it is the lightest AV. So I tried it, YES it was very light but the problem was the scanner, (of course, I USED THESE ANTIVIRUSES IN FULLY UPDATED STATES), when I used Bitdefender Total Security 2009 thereafter, I found a lot of viruses/malwares/trojans/whatever you call the other viruses/-wares.. Bitdefender was really good, organized, not deadlier than Kaspersky, not too light like NOD32.. But right now I am dissatisfied again since it takes a lot of time to scan out the network, the local hard drives, and the web.. T_T now I'm hanging as to what I should pick.. I hope I could get an AV that is very light yet having a great/good/sensitive scanner with light continuous updates..
Comment/Reply (w/o sign-up)